What to report
Report factual errors, stale conditions, unsafe advice, broken links, source problems, translation issues, wrong locations, route mistakes, and local details that would change a traveler’s decision. Use the structured corrections queue when possible; it captures the page, issue, evidence, date, and confidence needed for review.
How review works
Submissions are prioritized by likely traveler impact, urgency, evidence quality, and whether the issue can be checked. A submission can lead to a direct correction, a clarification, a temporary warning, a request for more context, a source update, or no change when the evidence is insufficient or outside the site’s scope.
There is no fixed turnaround promise. Safety-sensitive and broadly misleading problems should be handled ahead of minor wording improvements.
How outcomes are recorded
When a correction materially changes published guidance, the update should be reflected on the affected page and, where useful for accountability, in the published corrections changelog. The changelog should describe the substance of the change without exposing a contributor’s private contact information.
What this process cannot do
The corrections process cannot settle private disputes, guarantee an operator’s current service, verify every traveler report, or replace urgent help from local authorities, emergency services, insurers, transport operators, or official agencies.
Contact and privacy
For general messages, partnerships, or contributor notes, use Contact. For information about personal details submitted with a correction, see the privacy notice.